بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم

عناوین بخش ها و منابع درس مقولات ویژه در فلسفه علم

مجید داودی بنی

 

عناوین موضوعات متناسب با 32 جلسه تدوین شده است. هدف آشنا کردن دانشجویان علم با برخی مباحث تکنیکی و جدید فلسفه علم است تاکید اصلی بر موضوع ساختار نظریه های علمی است.

 

 

ساختار نظریه های علمی

 

  1. مبانی ساختارگرایی در فلسفه علم

**Russell, B., “On the relations of universals and particulars,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11 (1911)

Carnap, R, Introduction of  The Logical Structure of the WorldThe Logical Structure of the World, Berkeley (1928)

Suppes, P. "What Is a Scientific Theory?" in Morgenssbesser's Philosophy of Science Today, New York (1967)

Sneed, J., Chapters III and IV of The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, (1971)

 

Da Costa and French's "Model's, Theories, and Structures: Thirty years on', Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67,  (2000)

Patrick Suppes, first and second chapters of Representation and Invarianceof Scientific Structures CSLI (2002)

** Craver's "Structures of Scientific Theories"in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science (2002)

 

  1. واقع گرایی ساختاری علمی معرفتی

Ramsey, F.P. “Theories,” in R.B. Braithwaite (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (1929)

Demopoulos, W. and Friedman, M., “Critical notice: Bertrand Russell'sThe Analysis of Matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest,”Philosophy of Science, 52 (1985)

Stein, H., “Yes, but… Some skeptical remarks on realism and antirealism,”Dialectica, (1989)

**Worrall, J., “Structural realism: The best of both worlds?” Dialectica, (1989)

Zahar, E. “Poincaré's structural realism and his logic of discovery,” in G. Heinzmann et al. (eds.), Henri Poincaré, Nancy (1994)

Votsis, I., “Is Structure Not Enough?” Philosophy of Science, 70 (2003)

Cei, J. and French, S. “Looking for Structure in all the Wrong Places: Ramsey Sentences, Multiple Realizability, and Structure,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37 (2006)

 

 

  1. واقع گرایی ساختاری علمی وجودی

**Ladyman, J., 1998. “What is structural realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29: 409–424.

–––, 2002 ‘Science, metaphysics and structural realism. Philosophica, 67: 57–76.

 

French and Ladyman's "Remodeling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure, Synthese136, (2003)

French, "A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don’t Know Much about Art . . . but I Know It Involves Isomorphism)", Philosophy of Science 70 (2003)

 

 

  1. انواع متباین ساختارگرایی علمی

 

Van Fraassen , Bas C. ‘On the Extension of Beth’s Semantics of Physical Theories’, Philosophy of Science, 37, (1970)

________________ “From a View of Science to a New Empiricism”, in Monton (2007)

Dicken, P. “Constructive Empiricism and the Metaphysics of Modality”,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58 (2007)

**Bueno, O., “What is Structural Empiricism? Scientific Change in an Empiricist Setting,” Erkenntnis, 50 (1999.)

Bueno, O.,  “Empiricism, Conservativeness, and Quasi-Truth”, Philosophy of Science, 66 (1999)

 

  1. انتقاد به ساختاراگرایی علمی

 

Psillos, S. “Is structural realism possible?” Philosophy of Science 69(2001)

Chakravartty, A. “The Structuralist Conception of Objects.” Philosophy of Science, (2003).**Frigg, R. and Votsis, I. ‘Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask’, European journal for philosophy of science, (2011),

Halvorson, H.. “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.” Philosophy of Science 79:183–206. (2012)